Tested the smaller Light Dependant Resistor didn't work well in dim light conditions(night). The larger LDR is more sensitive and works at night conditions however has a longer tube which will be incorporated in the footing.
Sunday, June 1, 2008
Light Sensors
Tested the smaller Light Dependant Resistor didn't work well in dim light conditions(night). The larger LDR is more sensitive and works at night conditions however has a longer tube which will be incorporated in the footing.
Servo Controller
Saturday, May 31, 2008
MESH VOTE PLEASE ALL COMMENT - BY MONDAY 9AM
FOLLOWING IS A OPTION OF TWO 'SYSTEMS' WE NEED
EVERYBODIES FEEDBACK ON IN
THE FORM OF A VOTE BEFORE WE CAN PROCEED.
PLEASE VOTE IN THE COMMENTS
SECTION OF THIS BLOG - BEFORE 9AM
MONDAY MORNING.
THE OPTIONS ARE -
'3D MESH' VIA ON SITE WEAVING
'INFILL FABRIC' PRE-MADE
PLEASE ALSO SPECIFY PREFERENCE FOR
BLACK OR WHITE...
PLEASE NOTE THAT WHICH EVER SYSTEM
HAS THE MOST VOTES
WIILL BE FURTHER RE-FINED... +
BE THE SYSTEM WE USE FOR THE MESH.
EVERYBODIES FEEDBACK ON IN
THE FORM OF A VOTE BEFORE WE CAN PROCEED.
PLEASE VOTE IN THE COMMENTS
SECTION OF THIS BLOG - BEFORE 9AM
MONDAY MORNING.
THE OPTIONS ARE -
'3D MESH' VIA ON SITE WEAVING
'INFILL FABRIC' PRE-MADE
PLEASE ALSO SPECIFY PREFERENCE FOR
BLACK OR WHITE...
PLEASE NOTE THAT WHICH EVER SYSTEM
HAS THE MOST VOTES
WIILL BE FURTHER RE-FINED... +
BE THE SYSTEM WE USE FOR THE MESH.
footing re design concept
so Adrian came by, said our foot looked like a toilet, laughed and then walked away. (Actually he said it looked chunky). So Phil, me and Franz are going to be busy redesigning it.. concept image
TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT IS BUSY!!
Friday, May 30, 2008
anim
I would suggest that you watch this video a couple of times, its showing all the configurations and the effect of the open and closing of the fanning and the lower and higher bloating simultaneously...
TECHNICAL: Push and Pull system model

These photos show the actual Push and Pull system built, as described earlier in TECHNICAL: Proposed Push and Pull system . This systems flaw is that there are too many moving parts, too many cut grooves on the 'arm' when cutting them up, and the amount of space it would take up in the footing. Proper 'arm' measurements were not taken into account, as why the upper 'arm' could not hold its positioned angle when the device was rotating. The model did produce the desired 'push and pull' movement wanted, and was a success in that department, but the above points mentioned overpowered it's advantages.
A new simpler system has been designed by using strings and the wind-up module (see TECHNICAL: Wind-Up Module ) to achieve the same effect. Further details on this will appear tomorrow.
MODULE HEIGHT
We managed to create a height of 1.9m with base distance of 2.0m without pushing or pulling the triangular modules, any further and the 'natural' height of the module will decrease. This photo shows this example, with Harry measuring approximately 1.85m.
Second photo has the bases approximately 2.3m apart. But with the right side of the base pushed forward. A clear example of how we want the modules to interact with users, when they're in a different position other than directly centre of the 2 bases.MEETINGS FOR TOMORROW
MATERIAL, TECHNICAL + CONCEPTUAL
UPDATE SAT MORN 10 AM - BE THERE
SKYPE MEETING WITH JO 4PM SATURDAY -
DONT MISS IT....
UPDATE SAT MORN 10 AM - BE THERE
SKYPE MEETING WITH JO 4PM SATURDAY -
DONT MISS IT....
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)






